As you may already be aware from my previous posts, The Guardian U.S. and NYU?s Studio 20 journalism lab have teamed up to push a project called The Citizens? Agenda into the media discourse surrounding the U.S. presidential 2012 election. The idea: find out what you?the citizens?want the candidates to be discussing over the next four months ? usually meaning questions of substance about policy rather than horserace and gotcha questions so pervasive in mainstream media.
A couple of weeks ago, I posted a call for the Scientific American community to provide us with the three most important science-related questions that they would like to see the candidates asked by the media or during presidential debates in the fall. The Scientific American community is one (actually the first to have this finished) of a number of topical communities providing questions. Naturally, our readers are interested in science, so we are focused on? the science topics here.
Our Facebook page post soliciting question received over 120 comments (as well as 104 Likes and 61 Shares). The blog post itself got an additional 18 comments. We asked you ?What three science questions do you think the U.S. presidential candidates should answer before we vote on November 6?? and since some comments included multiple questions, we got a grand total of 246 questions!
I am extremely happy with the quality and quantity of the submitted questions. You took this seriously and came up with a number of excellent questions.
An informal scan of the questions leads me to categorize questions by focus. There are: questions that ask for candidates to state science facts; questions that ask candidates? stances on hot and politicized science issues; questions that ask about the role of science in governing; and fun/silly/provocative questions
There is value in all four types of questions. Each one of them is multi-layered and is actually trying to examine the following:
- are candidates reasonably educated in basic science?
- are candidates well informed about current understanding of various aspects of the world?
- to what extent will candidates apply scientific knowledge and advice by scientists in shaping policy, as opposed to interest groups that may or may not adhere to empirical knowledge in their agendas?
- to what extent will candidate?s style of governing resemble scientific method: observing and studying the world as it really is (as opposed to what one wishes it to be), collecting and analyzing data, and applying best available remedies to the problems?
In short, all the questions are trying to get at this core issue: are the candidates reality-based?
But for purposes of our effort, we also had to classify the questions by topic.
Interestingly, the topic of greatest interest, judging from your responses (23 questions clearly and solely in this category), is Science Education ? its value, its role in society, the role of federal government in regulating it, and the need for its reform and funding. Interestingly, Role of Government in Science (22 questions) is also mostly about science education, so we fused the two categories into one.
This question, by our reader Cherry Kersey probably captures it the best:
How important do you feel science and science related education is in young children and how would you affect change so that U.S. students are competitive with the rest of the western world in these key subjects?
Some other examples are:
Do you think that promotion of critical thinking is a primary goal of education?
What role does the federal government play in supporting scientific education, infrastructure and research?
From media reports, it seems the U.S.? lags behind many other developed countries in protecting the populace from harmful chemicals and substances. Our laws and regulations seem to be designed to protect business interests first and foremost, and only to protect the populace or environment when it has been clearly proven (for example, from a lot of people/animals dying or being sickened by something that has been on the market for a number of years) and there is public outrage. What would you do to address this?
How will you help the USA recapture its #1 place in the STEM sciences, and how is education part of this important agenda?
Do you support evidence based education? If not, how are we to improve education? If so, how soon can we get rid of No Child Left Behind, which had no pilot?
What is the cost of American college education relative to its value to students and to the nation at large? Please describe that cost/benefit ratio in terms of its distribution throughout the current population of students who are in college or who are about to attend. Is that ratio favorable or unfavorable? If less than favorable, what actions would you recommend as President to make it more favorable?
Do you support evidence-based education? If not, how are we to improve education? If so, how soon can we get rid of No Child Left Behind, which had no pilot?
What role does the federal government play in supporting scientific education, infrastructure and research?
Can the decline in U.S. ranking in science be directly attributed to the anti-science policies of today?s conservatives, and what affects will the continuation of these policies have on the standing of the U.S. as a leader in science in the future?
Do you believe the federal government should place more emphasis on increasing the number of young Americans who pursue careers in science, technology, engineering or mathematics, or not?
Are you going to seriously fund scientific research? How will science help you develop policy? What are you going to do to make the benefits of scientific research benefit the American people?
In your opinion, who gets to decide the truth of a scientific concept? The people, the experts, or the well-funded?
What are you going to do to increase the number of scientists in office, ensuring the people making scientific decisions are in fact qualified to do so?
Will you support reestablishment of the Office of Technology Assessment to aid officials in proper evaluation of complex scientific issues? If not, why?
How will science help you develop policy?
What government body do we have to thank for the most inventions applicable to modern daily life in the last 50 years? (Answer is NASA)
~~~
The second topic, with 18 questions focusing entirely on it, is Evolution, still a hot topic in this country. Our chosen question is by our reader Joseph Yaroch:
Explain why you think voters should care about your stance on evolution.
Here is a sampling of some other related questions:
Do you understand the role natural selection has played in the development of complex life over the last several billion years?
What is your opinion on the debate of evolutionary theory vs creationism?
Do you accept the theory of evolution? If so, do you accept that simply saying so is counter-intuitive to our current legal financial subsidies binding church & state?
Do humans and apes have a common ancestor?
What actions will be taken on school boards across the country that are eliminating scientific evidence of evolution from the curriculum?
Are you willing to defend separation of church and state and support the teaching of evolution in schools?
~~~
The third most exciting topic to our readers, with 17 questions clearly and solely in this category, is Climate Change. The most representative question comes from our reader Eli Hernandez is:
Is global warming and climate change significantly and negatively affected by human industrial and fossil fuel consumption activity and if so what is our Government?s Role and Responsibility in mediating a solution?
Some more examples:
What should the US role be in controlling climate change and what would you do to advance it?
Even the most devout global warming advocates grudgingly admit that proposed regulations would only delay the inevitable (if global warming is in fact occurring), while the political/economic costs of such regulation would be devastating to the United States. Are you factoring the cost vs. the benefits of global warming regulation in your policy decisions? Will you publish this analysis?
How does the greenhouse effect work, and do you think that humans are interfering with its proper function?
Do you accept the scientific consensus on climate change and what policies do you propose to prevent and mitigate its effects.
Do you agree with over 90% of the world?s climate scientists that humans are at least CONTRIBUTING to global warming?
~~~
The topics that follow are Space Exploration, Energy, Science Funding, Environment+Sustainability, Economics, GMOs, and general science questions (of the ?what is an electron?? type), as well as a number of other categories with just 1-2 questions.
Finally, there was a ?Silly? category, with only 12 questions (yes, guys, you were serious about this project!). Our favorite in the Silly category is this one, by nouseforaname.
Was Jar-Jar [Binks] possible through evolution?
Now I really wish someone would ask that question in the debate!
~~~
Now that the questions are out, watch the The Guardian U.S. site for updates. Spread the word. Let?s all try to push for these questions to actually get asked of the candidates in the debates, or in other media outlets.
fox mole manson bubba watson recent earthquakes lollapalooza fbi most wanted list stuttering
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.